Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
November 11, 2012
Image Size
379 KB
Resolution
425×600
Submitted with
Sta.sh
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
4,308
Favourites
608 (who?)
Comments
57
Downloads
398

Camera Data

Make
Canon
Model
Canon EOS REBEL T3i
Shutter Speed
1/197 second
Aperture
F/32.0
Focal Length
69 mm
ISO Speed
400
Date Taken
Oct 13, 2012, 10:23:57 PM
Software
Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Sensor Size
1mm
×
There Can Be Only One by goRillA-iNK There Can Be Only One by goRillA-iNK
The lens flare in this is 100% real.
Just like my love for Pepsi is 100% real.

I hope you like it.
Thank you for the views, faves, and comments.:heart:

Add a Comment:
 
:iconflashtail101:
i like coke better
but great shot its really cool looking! :iconcokeplz:
Reply
:iconiamsprinklesgirl:
IAMsprinklesGirl Nov 25, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I said it again...
Reply
:iconsilki88:
silki88 Nov 15, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Awesomee!!!
Reply
:iconjamarbhsamurai:
JamarBHSamurai Nov 13, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
:pepsi: forever
Reply
:iconcodywolf:
Love that the water looks like ice or crystal! Great shot!
Reply
:iconthatzombieguy:
ThatZombieGuy Nov 13, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Great shot.
Reply
:iconmemoriesbybren:
Memoriesbybren Nov 12, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Awesome! shot :D I like Pepsi as well, but I prefer the Wild Cherry Pepsi :D
Reply
:iconmylifeinfocus:
MyLifeInFocus Nov 12, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
I like it, but I gotta say, I'm guessing it's a response to the other days deviation of almost identical material, save for being pepsi instead of coke, and I'm afraid I think it's a bit of fail in originality, it is again, almost identical, it's a cool enough concept to be like, hmm lemme try that, but not something I'd use. I think what would have been really cool, is make a response to it, but make it *your's* somehow, a different concept that relates, but doesn't copy, however that may be. An artist should not be found (in my opinion) replicating another's concept, they should take that other concept into consideration and then make their photo (or any work) better and different, and your's is different to an extent, but it just feels too much like a copycat. Just my thoughts, I'm a fan of your work but I think something different would've been appropriate. (photo by the way: [link])
Reply
:icongorilla-ink:
goRillA-iNK Nov 16, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Technically this assumption is incorrect.
I've shot this before, and when I did it for the very first time, I did it with a Nikon L110.
It's a very cheap camera, in comparison to the Canon EOS REBEL T3i.

Here was my first shot ever of the water splashing Pepsi can, and a few others that I've shot before this one you're commenting on.
1. [link]
2. [link]
3. [link]

Now if you have clicked and viewed the images than maybe- just maybe you will understand my actual reasons for re-shooting this.
I wanted to see if a quality camera would make a difference, and I think it did, regardless of the views and favorites it received.
Sugar Splash by *naked-in-the-rain this is the image and the photographer you are referring to.
I am more than sure that this photographer wasn't the first ever to photograph water splashing all over a can or bottle of Coke, or any other soft drink.
If you want to see examples from a different group of photographers that could argue that they were copied by *naked-in-the-rain,
or that they were copied by each other, then click these links.
>>>[link]<<< >>>[link]<<< >>>[link]<<< >>>[link]<<< >>>[link]<<< >>>[link]<<< >>>[link]<<< >>>[link]<<<
Originality fail?
I think we've all been there.
There's nothing new under the sun. (This statement or quote is also unoriginal as well.)
Reply
:iconmylifeinfocus:
MyLifeInFocus Dec 2, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Ok, and I sort of knew this may be the case but still wanted to mention it.

I understand why you did it, comparing the two, I've done similar tests as well, the drawback I see from doing that is now you have 4 fairly similar shots in your gallery, same subject matter as well (and yes I realize I have very similar shots of a few things, but I feel that as of recently I've kept it to a minimum), and again, I understand why you'd do that but where I feel it may not be the best is that you posted them (and to be fair, this is certainly the best of the lot).

What I also want to mention is actually you and *naked-in-the-rain were the first two I've seen do this, though I'm not surprised there's more. You are totally right that we've all fallen to that, but I feel that there is a bit to be discovered under the sun, there's a difference in varying subject matter and varying your subject's matter :P For example, there's hundreds of photos of animals/landscapes/etc, but I enjoy a wide variety of those, because despite the fact that each is a lion, or a wide view of the mountains, there's for the most part a very distinguishable factor to those I like! It's nothing new to take a photo of a riveting landscape, with an amazing sunset, but that sunset is likely different from any other captured by anyone else unless that someone is standing beside you.

I apologize if I offended you in any way.
Reply
Add a Comment: